peter jones story
which one should i believe? peter lavenda or alex jones on what masons beleive?
http://cid-fff19b48ee821aa4.skydrive.live.com/browse.aspx/public10/SecretSocietyRoundtable?uc=3
in this audio alex jones tells the story of george washington and masonry and the illuminati and thats how tstory goes that Masons are evil, alex specifically debunks the Lightbearer as luciferian,
but peter lavenda defends the light bearer as one who simple carries a candle.
which one do i believe, we know the illuminati did try to usurp the free masons, even peter in his book and interveiw on secret temples agrees. sigh
peterlavenda interveiw
http://cid-fff19b48ee821aa4.skydrive.live.com/browse.aspx/Public7/secrettemplePeterlavindaInterveiwClips
Funny… two points of view, and both are wrong. Sometimes it just doesn’t break down all that easily now does it?
If you are actually interested in forming a point of view on Freemasonry, then do so, but it will take a lot more effort on your part than just to hear the ramblings of two anti-Masons, at least if you want to do so fairly.
So go ahead and look at the works of these two, along with that of any other anti-Masons, but look too at the works of any number of Masons who have written about the fraternity, talk to a few Masons, ask questions, look at multiple points of views held by Masons and anti-Masons alike… then make your own choice as to what to believe based on your own research.
For my own part, based on some of what you have mentioned here, if you learn and understand the structure of Masonry, and how it governs itself, you will realize that “infiltration” of the fraternity on whole is not possible, and was not even possible when the now long dead illuminati may of tried. You will see that the whole “light-bearer” and “luciferian” thing has nothing to do with Freemasonry at all, and is a misconception based various out-of-context quotes and misquotes from a philosophical work (written by a Mason) which compares and contrasts the Bible against other Christian texts (especially Milton’s “Paradise Lost”) as well as against certain Christian beliefs that were popular at the time the book was written. In fact the work in question doesn’t really “say” anything, it just looks, without making judgement, at various theories and ideas that were a part of Christian and American culture at the time. Totally under-whelming really.
At any rate do yourself a favor and look closer at the whole thing prior to passing judgement either way.
Dragons’ Den: The Dragons’ Stories: Peter Jones’ Story – 6 of 6
